Is this the “China Dream”?

Written by Robert S. Wang.

On 5 February 2019, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post (SCMP) published an article entitled “PLA bombers, jet fighters in Beijing’s ‘Happy Lunar New Year’ video message to Taiwan” and provided a link to the film itself, titled “My Fighting Eagles Fly Around Formosa.” According to the SCMP, this three-and-a-half minute video was released on Weibo, a popular social media platform in China, by the PLA Air Force Airborne Corps on Sunday (3 February) with a note saying it was to celebrate the New Year.

The film starts by displaying beautiful scenes of what appears to be Taiwan’s mountains, lakes and rivers, and ocean waters surrounding its islands. It also includes shots of children playing in the water and on beaches, grandparents celebrating with their family at home, shoppers and others strolling on crowded city streets, and the iconic Taipei 101 skyscraper. At the same time, interspersed throughout the film were images of Chinese bombers and fighters flying in formation and doing maneuvers among white clouds and in clear blue skies, taking off and landing, and young pilots in uniform marching around their aircrafts. The lyrics of the catchy music accompanying these images sing of “my fighting eagles flying around Formosa softly calling on brothers and sisters to return.”

…how will China’s neighbours, such as Japan, Vietnam or the Philippines, view this video? If, as it suggests, the Chinese government is willing to use force against its own “brothers and sisters” in Taiwan, what would it be willing to do to its non-ethnic Han neighbours…

In watching this video several times, I still find it hard to understand its intent and targeted audience. Is it trying to persuade Taiwan’s “brothers and sisters” portrayed in the film to return? Did the video producers, and the Chinese government, really believe that this film would actually win over the hearts and mind of the people of Taiwan to the prospect of reunification? Having worked and lived in Taiwan for many years, I cannot imagine that even my most ardent friends in the Kuomintang (KMT) would see this video as attractive and persuasive to them and their supporters, much less my friends in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). If the Chinese government considers this video to be an effective propaganda tool, it only shows to me how very much detached they are from the reality of Taiwan and its people today.

Insofar as the video was released on Weibo, it may be that the intended audience is actually the Chinese public, especially those exuberant nationalists on the internet. Here, the intent may be to build up patriotism and strengthen support for the government, especially in the wake of increasing doubts about the current economy. At the same time, one wonders if the general public would welcome military threats and perhaps even attacks on their civilian “brothers and sisters” across the Strait? This seems to be what the film implies, even if juxtaposed with beautiful scenery and soft music. Having worked and lived in China for over a decade spanning 30 years, I doubt that my many friends on the mainland would welcome such a scenario, however much they favor reunification. If I’m wrong, it would suggest an even wider cross-Strait gap than I had thought and would confirm the worst fears of the Taiwan people about the prospect of reunification with their “brothers and sisters” across the Strait.

Well, then, is the film also meant for a global audience, for example, the United States? Speaking as an American, as well as a former US diplomat who had worked and lived in Asia for over 30 years, this video underscores vividly the continued relevance and significance of US commitment to Taiwan under the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA). It dramatically pronounces not only the unwillingness of China to renounce the use of force against Taiwan but its increasing willingness to resort to coercive measures which the TRA was and is still designed to deter and counter.

For years, many have argued that the US government should not provoke Beijing into “squeezing” Taiwan, and should try to help maintain the status quo, by not going too far in our expressed support for Taiwan. It would appear today that such an approach has not been very effective, as China has continued to build up its military power and to escalate the threat against a peaceful and democratic Taiwan that has maintained the status quo. China’s actions should not come as a surprise, however, since Beijing’s long-stated goal is ultimately to change the status quo and reclaim Taiwan, even if it requires the use of force. More generally, this video lends credence to the increasingly prevalent view in the United States that China’s rise will not be a peaceful one for the region, and certainly not for Taiwan. This video will likely convince more Americans, especially in Congress, to affirm US commitments by increasing political and military support for Taiwan in the face of Beijing’s coercion.

And how will China’s neighbours, such as Japan, Vietnam or the Philippines, view this video? If, as it suggests, the Chinese government is willing to use force against its own “brothers and sisters” in Taiwan, what would it be willing to do to its non-ethnic Han neighbours, or its own ethnic minorities for that matter, who have differences that conflict with China’s self-declared core interests? It may be that Beijing will succeed in intimidating them by the use or show of force, but can China really afford a major conflict at this stage in its development without serious domestic repercussions? In any case, what this video will do is to enhance the perception of an aggressive and threatening China on the rise.

So, given the above, I just don’t understand how the Chinese government could believe that this Air Force video, as well as its recent military activities, are actually advancing the goal of Taiwan’s reunification. What I’m more concerned about, however, is how this video may in fact reflect the mindset and values of current Chinese leaders who are bent on realising the “China Dream” as its power expands. For decades, China has largely ignored or evaded international trade rules and free market norms, arguing that it is still a developing country. China has continued to exercise and now even tightened one-party rule arguing that democracy and human rights are Western concepts and not part of traditional Chinese culture, even as Taiwan has evolved into a vibrant democracy over the past 20 years. I’m afraid that unless Chinese leaders see a serious cost to pursuing such policies, they will not see a need to alter what seems to have been a very successful policy for the country, at least in the near term. And unless there is determined and concrete push-back – not just another new set of dialogues – from the US and other like-minded members of the international community today, the risks of greater confrontation, instability and even war will rise in the coming years.

Robert S. Wang is a Senior Associate with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) and an adjunct professor at the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service (SFS). He was a career Foreign Service Officer in the U.S. Department of State from 1984-2016. Image credit: CC by rhk 111/Flickr


  1. “I just don’t understand how the Chinese government could believe …”

    This exasperated confession expresses succinctly how little is understood even by experts with many years of China experience. That’s quite a dangerous state of affairs.

    Chinese government leaders are not stupid. They are strategic thinkers. Are they? Or are they helplessly driven from one issue to the next? Each issue addressed by blunt tools, such creating ever more follow-on problems. Apparently, Chinese government leaders are strategic thinkers who are driven by a torrent of hardly understood issues that are the unavoidable consequence of rapid change and increasing complexity in society and economy.

    Perhaps it’s high time to study strategic thinking with Chinese characteristics and to study what a bent on omnipotent control means for the adaptability of society and economy.

    Let me propose a hypothesis. Relying on omnipotent control leads towards a dead end where unresolved contradictions and fissures get entangled into a Gordian knot. The China Communist Party will then try to untangle itself from the mess by violently cutting the knot. They are distracting from trouble at home by directing fervent patriotism at enemies on the outside.

    To this end they will use whatever means necessary to reclaim sovereignty over Taiwan, the last remaining symbol of humiliation by western powers. If the US interferes, much the better. America’s military bases encircling China’s sea shore are an insult to China’s dignity by controlling its access to the wider world and an obstacle to protect its interests in the East China Sea and in the South China Sea.

    This hypothesis and the deduced consequences may seem overblown. But why else would President Xi Jinping insistently urge China’s soldiers to get “combat ready” (China Daily) and “concentrate preparations for fighting a war” (South China Morning Post)? Why else would he “abruptly summon hundreds of officials to Beijing recently” and tell them that the Communist Party “faces major risks on all fronts and must batten down the hatches” as reported by the New York Times?


    1. Dear Henri – Sorry for not having responded earlier but had been traveling a lot (for work and vacation) in the spring and summer. Let me explain a bit more directly what I meant in my post. I do understand why the Chinese use the “blunt tools” that they use but was just trying to point out to them (again, as I have many times while working in China) that these tools tend to be counterproductive when used against people abroad, including in Taiwan…and Hong Kong today. That’s why I described the likely reaction of most people in Taiwan, US and other countries in the region. Nonetheless, many Beijing’s leaders who have been through the revolution, and the internal struggles of the Civil War and the Cultural Revolution, still believe that “power comes out of the barrel of a gun” (Mao’s saying) and that eventually this will be borne out. That’s why they still tend to resort to the show of force as a means of intimidation. And this is why I then urge our leaders to “push back” to underscore the message that this will not work at least with respect to Taiwan…. as we just saw with the recent F-16V arms sale. I don’t think the current Chinese leaders are convinced yet, and they may yet be proven right if we do eventually back down. I also do understand that they may be using external hostilities and tensions to distract their own people from troubling domestic issues (that was actually my dissertation topic more than 40 years ago). This tactic tends to work for a while but usually not for too long if the leaders don’t address the domestic issues. Hope this clarifies my thinking a bit more. Best, Bob


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s